1. Entertainment

Discuss in my forum

'The Wolfman' Movie Review

About.com Rating 3 Star Rating
User Rating 3 Star Rating (2 Reviews) Write a review

By , About.com Guide

Benicio Del Toro in 'The Wolfman.'

Benicio Del Toro in 'The Wolfman.'

© Universal Pictures
Benicio Del Toro is a lifelong fan of the classic Universal Pictures monster movies and playing the wolf man in The Wolfman, an R-rated horror thriller directed by Joe Johnston, is a dream come true for the Oscar-winning actor. Del Toro gets furry and ferocious in this homage to the 1941 film, with this new take on the classic tale similar in spirit, tone, editing style, and plot to the movie that inspired it.
Director Johnston keeps the scenery spooky and the lighting dim, going for squeals with a spattering of jump in your seat moments and plenty of gore. The transformation from man to beast is a sight to behold, a combination of CG and Rick Baker's special effects makeup bringing the wolf man to life in all his furious glory. Del Toro writhes in pain as through movie magic his arms, legs, feet and hands stretch and reshape into wolf form. Claws emerge, teeth elongate, and fur sprouts all over his body as the iconic look of the wolf man is brought to life again on the big screen. This scene alone almost makes The Wolfman worthwhile. If only the dialogue and the final climatic fight weren't so incredibly bad, this Wolfman might have been a howling good time at the movies.

The Story

Actor Lawrence Talbot leaves the stage to return to his ancestral home in Blackmoor, England after receiving news from this brother's fiancee, Gwen (Emily Blunt), that his brother's gone missing. Lawrence was sent away to America as a young boy after witnessing the death of his mother, and his relationship with his father, John (Anthony Hopkins), is nonexistent. But Gwen needs his help and because he still loves the brother he hasn't seen in decades, he returns to his family's creepy mansion.

Within minutes of his arrival, Lawrence's father tells him Ben's dead, hopes he has a nice suit for the funeral, and becomes distracted by the moon. Their relationship remains strained as Lawrence tries to deal with his brother's death at the hands of either a deranged man or some sort of large beast.

Benicio Del Toro and Anthony Hopkins in 'The Wolf Man.'

Benicio Del Toro and Anthony Hopkins in 'The Wolfman.'

© Universal Pictures
The villagers all believe the town's being terrorized by a vicious creature, but Lawrence is understandably skeptical. That changes when, while visiting a gypsy camp in his search for answers about Ben's death, he's attacked and bitten by a werewolf.

Scotland Yard's Inspector Aberline (Hugo Weaving) shows up, fresh off of unsuccessfully heading the investigation into the Jack the Ripper murders. Aberline's a practical, logical man who poo-poos the villagers' claims of a creature roaming their woods.

Meanwhile, Gwen helps to nurse Lawrence back to health, bonding with the man who would have been her brother-in-law in an ideal world. Lawrence's recovery from the brutal attack is surprisingly quick. He feels changes in his body, the scar fades completely in a matter of days, and he begins to feel like he's spinning out of control. And he is... The beast has infected him and when the moon is full, Lawrence goes hunting humans.

The Acting

Old-school horror fans are going to get much more out of 2010's The Wolfman than those who aren't familiar with The Wolf Man of 1941. Lon Chaney set the bar high for all future werewolves with his portrayal of a conflicted man fighting against his inner beast. Del Toro, all broody and angst-filled, fits near perfectly into the part of Lawrence Talbot, though just a tad more emotion might have helped warm the hearts of a few Del Toro fence-sitters into totally embracing him as the wolf man.

With very limited, elementary dialogue, Del Toro has to make us feel for this conflicted man, even after we see him rip innocent Londoners apart. As much as I admire Del Toro's ability to crawl deep into a character, I was never completely drawn into caring as much as I should have for this man who has his future ripped out from under him after he's bitten by a werewolf. However, Del Toro does look terrific in wolf makeup.

Fortunately for the film, Del Toro's surrounded by three actors who do draw the audience in. Emily Blunt's Gwen is a beautiful, innocent yet strong woman who finds herself falling for her dead boyfriend's brother. Blunt looks ethereal dressed up in 1800's attire, yet under the corsets there's a tough inner core to Gwen that Blunt makes sure shines through.

Blunt's great, but it's really Hugo Weaving and Sir Anthony Hopkins who save the day (or night) for The Wolfman. Hopkins plays John Talbot as quietly mad, chewing up and spitting out the scenery with such flair as to make this Wolfman more John Talbot's show than Lawrence's. Likewise with Weaving's performance. Weaving doesn't stomp around acting all authoritative as this renowned Scotland Yard inspector. Instead, he's quiet, controlled, and a complete scene-stealer.

Benicio Del Toro photo The Wolfman

Benicio Del Toro in full wolf man mode.

© Universal Pictures

The Bottom Line

Loved the production design, the cinematography, costumes, and Rick Baker's fantastic furry make-up, but The Wolfman overall didn't leave me howling with joy. It's not as deep, scary, or fast-paced as it needs to be to really grab hold of the audience. Action scenes overwhelm character development, though Johnston and screenwriters David Self and Andrew Kevin Walker do try to build the relationships before everything gets all wolfie. Preview audiences forced cuts in the first section of the film that lopped off much of the relationship development, and its loss is a real shame.

It also doesn't help that the score is too intrusive/predictable and that a few of the more important special effects were on the level with what we had to endure in another recent film with wolves, New Moon. Now, I'm not referring to Del Toro's transformation into a wolf man - that was brilliantly done - but both the major chase sequence through the streets and over the rooftops in London and the final battle are extremely disappointing, executed poorly enough so as to jar you out of the movie. Both critical scenes were visually off, and that's too bad as most of the action sequences were handled quite well. Heads and body parts are ripped off by the rampaging wolf man, and the special effects are realistically gruesome. It's just too bad not all scenes are of the same high level effects-wise as the wolf man transformation and the bloody killing sprees.

GRADE: B-

The Wolfman is rated R for bloody horror violence and gore.

Theatrical Release: February 12, 2010

Disclosure: This review is based on a screening provided by the studio. For more information, please see our Ethics Policy.

User Reviews

 2 out of 5
The Wolfman, Member willyt2

In 1941 Universal Studios released a film called ""The Wolf Man"" starring Lon Chaney Jr. It was a hit, advancing acting, makeup, and sets. The Wolf Man is the only Universal monster to be played by the same actor in all of its 1940s film appearances. Chaney was very proud of this as he claimed in interviews that the Wolf Man was ""his baby."" Oscar winner Benicio Del Toro was chosen to play this year's hairy creature because many said that he looked like Chaney. But is he as good? The movie starts when Lawrence Talbot is taken back to his family home after his brother disappears. He learns that something with brute strength and insatiable bloodlust has been killing the villagers and that a suspicious Scotland Yard inspector named Alberine has come to investigate. The sets and the makeup have a really fake yet interesting look to them. I like the fact that the atmosphere was sort of tacky like Universal's old films. The trees look fake in the forest, the fog looks like it's coming from a fog machine, and the makeup resembles a lot of the look of the 1941 film. Some may see these elements as stupid ones but I think they're fun to be around along with the black and white Universal title at the beginning. There is one scene that has true quality to it. Towards the middle of the film, we see Lawrence Talbot transform for the second time into the monster. He ends up running from the Scotland Yard inspector atop London's rooftops. The music and cinematography are very well done in this sequence and blend fantastically together. In the 1941 version, Lon Chaney had to perform with only makeup on and nothing else. He had to act, show emotion, and find depth in his character. Here, in this definite modernized version of the story, there are only a few valuable shots of the Wolf Man in makeup. The rest is CGI. Benicio Del Toro doesn't have to act much as the fully transformed creature. It is controlled by a computer now, not an actor. We don't get that true, raw, elegant character performance as much today which is unfortunate because this is part of movie magic. The cast is not as great as you would think. Anthony Hopkins isn't that good, just annoying. And Emily Blunt's performance is one note. Overall, this is a bland movie. The pacing is what makes it poor and it's very predictable. It's only interesting when the Wolf Man transforms and when there are guts flying on the screen. I honestly don't think this movie could've been scarier than it is though. Nothing, no matter what you do, can make a scary ""Wolf Man"" movie because he isn't a horrifying character and he is not real, as opposed to a movie like ""The Strangers"" which could really happen. Do you think anything can be made into horror? This remake could’ve been worse but I suggest you wait for the DVD.

Write a review

1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes | No

See all 2 reviews

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.