1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Hollywood Movies

Lions for Lambs Movie Review

About.com Rating two out of Five

By Rebecca Murray, About.com

Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise in Lions for Lambs.

© MGM/United Artists
Take a hot button subject, an Oscar-winning director, and place some heavy star power in front of the camera and you have all the ingredients for a mega hit that will pack theaters and leave people buzzing, right? Unfortunately, the answer’s no in the case of Lions for Lambs. Lions for Lambs has all those elements but the filmmakers somehow forgot to add the most important part of the recipe to the mix – a real story to tell.

The Story

Lions for Lambs follows three storylines playing out simultaneously. One segment focuses on Republican Senator Jasper Irving (Tom Cruise), a politician with a risky idea on how to stop the war. Senator Irving invites a journalist (Meryl Streep) who’s been in the business for 40+ years – long enough to have covered the debacle that was the Vietnam War – into his office for an hour long one-on-one in order to give her an exclusive on his ambitious new plan of attack. Irving's plan: to surprise the enemy by using smaller, quick-moving military units. Of course that means there’s less support and back-up should things turn nasty, but Senator Irving’s ready to take that risk because, as he tells the reporter, he’ll do whatever it takes to turn the war around.

While Senator Irving’s busy explaining his approach to winning in Iraq and Afghanistan, lifelong friends Ernest Rodriguez (Michael Pena) and Arian Finch (Derek Luke) are sitting with their fellow soldiers as their commanding officer explains their next mission – a mission based on Senator Irving’s proposal. Their leader admits the plan’s being rushed into fruition, but they are under orders to carry out the attack. Exactly how rushed the mission is quickly becomes evident when the unit’s helicopter comes under heavy fire and Rodriguez and Finch are left alone in enemy territory after falling (or in Finch’s case, jumping) from the helicopter.

Michael Pena and Derek Luke in Lions for Lambs.
© MGM/United Artists
In California, Professor Stephen Malley (Robert Redford) calls student Todd Hayes (Andrew Garfield) into his office to discuss his future. Malley sees something special in the kid, despite the fact he’s no longer showing up for class on a regular basis. Once passionate about political science, Todd has become disconnected and cynical. Malley thinks there’s a way to reach him, if only he can get Todd to become engaged in current affairs. Believing there’s an activist waiting to be awakened, Malley tells Hayes all about two of his favorite students – Ernest and Arian – who left college because they wanted to make a difference and couldn’t do so by just talking about ways to fix things. They gave up college life to enlist in the military to see for themselves what’s going on beyond the safe walls of their California college.

The Cast

Senator Irving’s priming himself for an eventual run at the presidency and Cruise’s performance captures that sickeningly smooth political vibe. Redford’s fine as a college professor who’s been around the block quite a few times but hasn’t given up hope that he can positively influence his students into becoming better human beings.

The usually stellar Streep is, for lack of a better description, wasted as a reporter who knows she’s being used and manipulated yet can’t seem to stop playing along anyway. Streep’s playing a woman who has supposedly interviewed thousands during her four decades in the business, yet she fidgets and huffs her way through this one interview with this particular senator. She knows him, he likes her, so why the nervousness? The decision by either Redford, Streep or a combination of the two award-winners to play her as almost overwhelmed by her interviewee’s presence was a weird choice.

Hardly any scenes felt organic other than the ones involving the military operation, and most played out as though the actors were reading from scripts held barely out of frame. None of the leads sold their stories with the exception of Michael Pena and Derek Luke. These two made the most of their parts in Lions for Lambs, and gave the film a much needed jolt of both emotion and adrenaline whenever they appeared onscreen.

The Bottom Line

For the most part I’m betting Redford, screenwriter Matthew Michael Carnahan and company will be preaching to the choir with Lions for Lambs. Those who’ve seen the trailer or read anything about the film will know going in that the movie blasts President Bush and all those who backed the war in Iraq. But the film does absolutely nothing to win over the hearts or change the minds of fence-sitters, and that seems to have been its entire goal.

Get engaged, speak out - the call to action is the point of the film. Lions for Lambs is not here to entertain us, it’s here to inform anyone willing to listen about what’s going on right now in the world. However, and this is where the movie fails so miserably, there’s a whole lot of bluster and pontificating that leads to absolutely nowhere. That’s right, nowhere. After sitting through this dialogue-heavy drama and you're expecting all the insistent yapping to have been leading up to a finale that’ll knock your socks off or at least leave you anxious to make your voice heard, there’s a meek little ending that’s more of a feeble whimper than a roar. Lions for Lambs is an extremely disappointing film that wastes a solid premise.

GRADE: C-

Lions for Lambs was directed by Robert Redford and is rated R for some war violence and language.

Explore Hollywood Movies

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Hollywood Movies
  4. Films By Genre
  5. Dramas
  6. Lions for Lambs
  7. Lions for Lambs Movie Review - Review of Lions for Lambs Starring Cruise, Streep and Redford

©2008 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.