1. Entertainment

Discuss in my forum

'Hereafter' Movie Review

About.com Rating 2 Star Rating
User Rating 4 Star Rating (2 Reviews) Write a review

By , About.com Guide

Matt Damon in Hereafter

Matt Damon in 'Hereafter.'

© Warner Bros Pictures
A member of the preview audience summed up my feelings on Hereafter in a succinct outburst as the last frame of the film rolled by, asking, "Is that it?" Even die-hard Clint Eastwood fans are going to be hard-pressed to find any reason to celebrate the arrival of the 80 year old director's latest film.

Hereafter starts off with an astounding scene of destruction as a tsunami sweeps over a resort causing massive amounts of damage and thousands of deaths. Clint Eastwood's done a fantastic job of displaying the deadly power of the water as it wipes out houses and hotels, destroying virtually everything in its path. However, for as beautifully staged as the tsunami scene is, the first glimpse at Eastwood's interpretation of what someone might see as they drift toward death is unsatisfying and, yes, even a little cheesy. And the fact that the first look at Eastwood's version of what might be the entry to the hereafter comes right on the tail of the tsunami only serves to make the ghostly appearances of the dead surrounded in brilliant white light look more hokey than they might have had the scene not been placed so close to such an amazing water effects.

So now, just barely into the film, there's good reason to worry that Hereafter isn't going to be one of Eastwood's finest films. And that worry that sets in early on continues to grow as Eastwood, working off of Peter Morgan's script, excruciatingly slowly goes through the paces. Ultimately what Eastwood delivers is a lackluster exploration of the afterlife through the eyes of the film's three central characters.

Cecile de France in Hereafter

Cecile de France in 'Hereafter.'

© Warner Bros Pictures

Hereafter - The Story

Cecile de France plays Marie Lelay, a French TV reporter with horrible timing. On vacation in a beach resort in Southeast Asia, she steps out of her hotel room - leaving behind her boyfriend/producer of her TV news show - and within minutes is swept away by a massive wave of water. She drowns and her lifeless body is pulled from the water by two good samaritans who try to revive her but fail. And as we see through her eyes, she's greeted in death by fuzzy images of others who've recently passed away. However, she's not dead and comes to believing she's had a near-death experience in which she's seen the other side. Although she returns to her job in France, the experience has traumatized her and left her wanting to further explore what happened to her in those brief moments underwater. All but forced out of her job because she's no longer able to concentrate on work, Marie sets to work researching and writing a book about the afterlife.

Meanwhile, George (Matt Damon) is a San Francisco-based medium who no longer wants to speak to the dead. He's put that part of his life behind him, but his brother (Jay Mohr) is convinced George has made the wrong decision. Why kill the cash cow when people are so hungry for answers and so determined to be able to reach out to those who have passed away that they'll pay handsomely for the privilege? George only wishes for a normal life, for the ability to be in a romantic relationship, but his psychic powers have always stood in the way. Even a pretty student (Bryce Dallas Howard) in his Italian cooking class expresses interest in him but then runs away after she discovers his ability, forces him to reach out to her dead relatives, and is freaked out by what he tells her they're saying from the beyond.

The third storyline takes place in England and involves the death of one twin, Jason, and the search for answers by Marcus, the surviving twin. Marcus wants to know what happens after we die and wants to communicate with his more confidant, 12 minute older brother who he desperately misses. Marcus' search for an explanation takes him to a variety of psychics, all of whom he quickly determines to be fakes.

The three stories converge, as you know full well they will from the start, as the search for answers leads George, Marie, and Marcus to a book fair of all places.

The Acting

Matt Damon is fine in this role that demands very little of him other than to talk to people who aren't there. Strangely, no one on the other side has all that much to say so his conversations aren't all that interesting. But back to Damon, he's become one of the most dependable actors of his generation, always giving 100% to every role he takes on. It's unfortunate there's just not that much in Peter Morgan's script for Damon to sink his teeth into.

Cecile de France didn't wow me as Marie. There seemed to be a lack of emotional commitment to the role, and I never felt anything for this woman who should have had my sympathy from the moment she survived the devastating tsunami.

Lyndsey Marshall and Frankie/George McLaren in Hereafter

Lyndsey Marshall and Frankie/George McLaren in 'Hereafter.'

© Warner Bros Pictures
The best performances in the film belong to twins George and Frankie McLaren, the boys who play Marcus and Jason. The McLaren brothers are making their feature film debuts with Hereafter although you'd never know it from their moving performances. Selected from a casting pool of over 100 twins, George and Frankie nail their scenes and make the story of a twin obsessed with learning about life after death the most compelling of the three storylines in Hereafter.

The Bottom Line

Though the characters travel the globe, Hereafter never actually goes anywhere. Morgan's script isn't up to his usual standards (The Queen, Frost/Nixon) and Eastwood's also off his game.

The film's tone shifts wildly and the pacing's incredibly slow. Sadly, that audience member who asked at the end of the film if that's all there is to Hereafter was right on. The answer is a very disappointing yes.

GRADE: C-

Hereafter was directed by Clint Eastwood and is rated PG-13 for mature thematic elements including disturbing disaster and accident images, and for brief strong language.

Theatrical Release: October 15, 2010 (limited) and October 22, 2010 (wide)

Disclosure: This review is based on a screening provided by the studio. For more information, please see our Ethics Policy.

User Reviews

 3 out of 5
Wave, what wave?, Member davetrainmore

This movie knocked my socks off, But it's not the movie on the silver screen, it's the yet unmade sequel that goes back to the female lead's original episode. While under water, to all those vague figures, what is time, and what is a wave? All that those family spirits have is time and emotions. How about a tsunami of emotions in the French Woman's family tree, which swept her ancestors away, in the days of the French Revolution, and First Napoleonic Empire, ending in 1815. Her family spirits have all the time in the world on their spectral hands, so when she bumped up against her very own giant wave, they were there for her. This is why this movie seems so aloof, it's because it's just getting down to the real nitty gritty, at it's end. Then the action must next travel to Paris, to let the real story behind her NDE, develop. Even in the far reaches of the South Pacific, she was still carrying the angst and emotions of her progenitors deep inside her, maybe, even in her genes. But bedding a real psychic, who is a student of Charles Dickens, and a surviving adolescent twin brother, tagging along, these three, can set out on the streets of Paris, and start a real life Da Vinci Code chase across present day France, much to the chagrin of her old boss, and the real life Paris Press Corps, of the present day. Mr. Eastwood has brought all of the chess pieces together at the end of the first movie, and now he needs to transport his crew over to Paris, Fr. and get them cooking, and I do mean doing more than chopping up tomatoes, to music. The entire Paris Press Corps, has gone down the wrong path, on a real National mystery, and this trio of actors can light them up, garnering millions of Euros of free publicity, in the process of making the sequel to ""Hereafter"". This story can be told through the lens of Charles Dicken's masterpiece, ""A Tale of Two Cities"". Add in the psychic's previous knowledge of Nostradamus and Edgar Cayce, who must be his ""North Star"", of sorts, and the story can take wing, and leave the charlatans, back in London. Fresh in Paris, with some real alternate history, guiding them, they can grab the year 1815, by it's throat, and work both forwards and back. Maybe the ultimate question to be answered is; 'how much did Charles Dickens know, and when did he know it'??? FWIW, in dowsing or psychic endeavors, it always seemed to me, that the important one is the person asking the hard questions. And this role seems to be in the province, of the surviving, adolescent, twin brother, from London. But does this review, open any doors for you? ""Hereafter"", is like the ending of Star Wars, when old Darth Vader's X fighter spirals down to the Planet's surface, escaping from the destruction of the Death Star Station. Yeah, there's still more action ahead, cause the ""Fat Lady"" hasn't sang yet.

Write a review

0 out of 4 people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes | No

See all 2 reviews

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.