1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Hollywood Movies
Spike Lee Discusses "She Hate Me"


Spike Lee and Woody Harrelson on the set of "She Hate Me."
Photo © Sony Pictures Classics
 Related Resources

• "She Hate Me" Photos, Credits and Trailer
• Monica Bellucci Films and Photos
• Upcoming Theatrical Releases
 

Anthony Mackie stars In Spike Lee's "She Hate Me" as John Henry Armstrong, a biotech executive who loses his job when he's labeled a whistleblower. Unable to find work in his chosen field, Armstrong does something drastic: he takes up his ex-girlfriend's offer of cash to impregnate her and her girlfriend. Word quickly spreads within the lesbian community, and Armstrong soon finds himself making $10,000 per 'service.' And while he might be raking in the dough from this unusual business arrangement, all's not well in Armstrong's life. Armstrong finds his world growing ever more complicated as his old boss contrives to frame him for securities fraud.

Why this movie and why now? Filmmaker Spike Lee addresses those questions and more in this interview to promote his latest movie, "She Hate Me."

INTERVIEW WITH FILMMAKER SPIKE LEE:

Could you talk broadly about what inspired you to make this movie and the things that were important for you to touch on?
The inspiration for this movie came from the New York Times and reading The Wall Street Journal when they broke the whole story on Enron. …And then when it broadened to Bernie Evers at WorldCom and [Kozlowski] at Tyco and Imclone, the Waskal Brothers, Martha Stewart, the Regis' at Adelphia, and just greed. Look, human beings are always going to be greedy, but this is, like, just bold-faced. They're not ever trying to be shy about it. Stealing money for the golf courses and paintings and all kinds of stuff. And then you see people being hurt. You know, I really felt sympathetic to the hard workers, the good hard-working Americans who worked at a company like Enron and put their life savings in Enron stock. And [it just] evaporated, it just disappeared.

When did the plot about impregnating lesbians come in?
That came at the same time. Because we wanted to tell more than one story, we wanted this film to have two spines and the thinking went like this: Progea is the company in this film, that scandal being, like, an overall view. But I think the audience would be able to identify more with one man's dilemma or journey and his own moral struggle. And that would be the thing with John Henry Armstrong and what he does.

Did you have any discussions with the gay community about the way that the lesbians were going to be portrayed in this movie?
Well, we hired a technical consultant. Her name is Tristan Taormino. Tristan is well-respected within the lesbian community so, we hired her, she worked with me on the script. You know, the script was written, but she looked at the script and pointed things out. She also worked with the actresses.

Was there any thought about the male aspect of bisexuality?
His character mentions that, but that's a whole other movie. We wanted to mention it, though.

Is it odd that these women are so impressed with his body?
Why? I don't think it's odd. Why is it odd?

Because they're acting like they are attracted to him.
Because they want to have nice-looking kids. No, no, no, though, it's not just his penis, they want to see his full physique. You want to see what you're buying. If you go to a sperm bank and you fill out a form, you write what height, weight, what color eyes, what color hair. If you want your sperm donor to have a post-graduate degree, that's an extra $5,000 dollars. So, to me, maybe not for you, but for me, I find it believable. If this guy's gonna be, if my egg's gonna meet his sperm, I want to see what his physique is. They know he went to Harvard, they know he got his MBA, they looked at his file, they see that his medical health, he's clean here. They questioned Fatima 10 million times, "What's he like?" you know, they want to know everything about him, because they're taking it serious. This guy is gonna help bring my child into the world, so for me, I find it believable that they want to see what the goods [are].

That scene plays like he's up on the auction block.
Exactly. I'm glad you brought that up because that scene for me, it works on double levels. The two levels are this: You have level of sexual objectification, which meant another story forever, which meant that now the tables were turned. But a more subtle level, which most people haven't gotten, the level of the auction block is a direct reference to African Americans being sold as slaves. When you stood up on that little thing and you were buck-naked and [the] master or potential master opened your mouth, felt your teeth like you were a horse and felt your genitals and felt your muscles. And if it looked like you were a big buck and you could sire a whole bunch of pickaninnies, than you got more money. So that was another reference to that.

Themes of race definitely play a part in this film.
But in the background. I don't think race is really overt in this. That's my opinion.

Why do you think the character ultimately condemns himself for helping these women?
That's a good question. There are some people in the world that have a problem with bringing 19 kids into the world and being paid for it. And also, I'd like to state, I'd like to make the point, it's not the fact that women are lesbians, it's just the fact that he feels like a prostitute. He brought 19 kids into this world.

A lot of those were complete families.
I understand that. But, John Henry Armstong still cannot get around the fact that even though he signed a donor waver agreement, even though these children are wanted and loved, he still is the father of 19 kids, and he got paid for it. And some people, some men…I would have a hard time with that on my conscience.

Are you saying it's important to have a male and female influence on a child?
No, I'm not saying that. I mean, there's been no scientific studies saying that children of same sex parents grow up to be any worse than any children with a mommy and a daddy at home.

You are a very political filmmaker. What are your thoughts on the upcoming election?
Oh, I'm very nervous about this election because we're all going to go to hell if George Bush wins. Well, we have to mobilize so that doesn't happen. People have to register to vote. Despite what we feel about John Kerry, we have to rally behind him.

Do you think this movie will help that?
No, I think the work's going to be done by "Fahrenheit 9/11." Yes, it's a great movie.

Can that movie help the change?
Yes, it has already. Let me answer it this way. Michael Moore would not need armed guards around him 24 hours a day if that film had no impact. The man has armed bodyguards around him 24-7. That is the biggest testament to the impact of the film.

There are a lot of themes in this about family. Can you talk about your stance and the things that were important to you?
Well, I think if you look at the end of the film, I think we present a new configuration of family, what people thought of family. Even 10 years ago, what people thought of family is much different than it is today. I found it very amusing that our new president tried to ram home this new amendment to the constitution that was quickly shot down, banning gay marriage. But, to answer your question in a broader sense, we wanted this film to reflect the crazy world we live in. And that was really the blueprint of this film, to jam pack as much as we could into this film within the allotted time, all the issues, and it would be like an assault. The same way individuals assault in the world we live in today with subject matter, images, and all types of stuff.

When you first started making movies, it was a revolution to show black professionals. Do you think that those kinds of straight forward movies can still be made, because this is high concept?
Well, I don't know how to really answer that question. I think that, again, this movie does not come from a Hollywood studio, the studio system. We went to everybody, they didn't want to make it, and I can understand so. But if you look at the films that they make for African American audiences, I think that their vision of African Americans is very limiting.

You made comments against "Soul Plane." Do you think those types of movies will continue to be made?
Oh, they'll continue to make them, and I know for sure if "Soul Plane" had been a hit, there would have been "Soul Plane 2." I don't have this on a…I was just told if that film had done well on opening weekend, Monday morning they would have put things in motion for the sequel.

Does a movie like that make you really concerned about African American portrayal in mainstream Hollywood?
Oh yes. I was disturbed before "Soul Plane." Let's not put everything on "Soul Plane," it's not like the first. That wasn't the first one.

Do you think that it's still a minstrel show or is it getting better?
I'm not that stupid. Will Smith, "I, Robot," made $52 million. But Will, Denzel [Washington], they're operating outside of what we're talking about. And also [there's] another advancement, I'll give you examples of three films that were directed by African Americans that had nothing to do with African American culture: Clark Johnson directed "SWAT," Antoine Fuqua, "King Arthur," F. Gary Grey with "The Italian Job" and "Be Cool," the new thing. So those are advancements. But, at the same time, I still am sad that there's not one African American who's in the gatekeeper position at a network or studio that can greenlight a picture. As far as the VP that creates things, several studios don't have an African American at all, this late in the game.

"SHE HATE ME" RESOURCES:
"She Hate Me" Photo Gallery
"She Hate Me" Credits, Trailer and Websites

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Name
Email



Previous Articles

Explore Hollywood Movies

More from About.com

  1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Hollywood Movies
  4. Films By Genre
  5. Comedy Movies
  6. She Hate Me
  7. Spike Lee Interview - She Hate Me Movie

©2008 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.